Winter, 2 0 0 5                                                                     VOLUME 2, NO. 1


periodic e-news about spirituality, wellness, and the common good
from Interweave Center For Wholistic Living, Summit, NJ

 

Red and Blue Diplomacy:
Debating the Soul of
America

            “How can they believe these things?” my neighbor exclaimed the day after the 2004 election. “What kind of people are they?” I had paid a “political pastoral call” on distraught neighbors lamenting the results and shocked by the widespread media explanation of the huge turnout of born-again Christians, galvanized by  “moral values” including abortion and gay marriage. Like so many Northeast and West Coast folk, my neighbor has been increasingly alarmed by the growing strength of the religious right, wondering from which planet those people had landed to sidetrack America from its progressive path. Many urban liberals feel threatened by unfamiliar, seemingly un-American forces, just like so many of those born-again Christians feel threatened by my neighbors’ liberal, “un-American” sentiments. Each of these groups sees the other through shocked, fear-tinged spectacles.

             A struggle to define the soul of America is at the heart of the culture clash which revealed its political power more fully in the November elections at both state and federal levels. Call the two sides what you will — conservative vs. liberal, traditional values vs. secular humanism — but it will only make things worse to use labels that distort and demonize rather than working to understand more clearly where the other side is coming from.  (We’ll explore this more fully in our February seminar, “Religious Zeal and the Culture Wars.”).

             Most conservative Christians are hardly “ignoramuses,” as distraught and disappointed neighbors and friends have called them, nor are most socially liberal people “duped by foreign ideas” as a conservative email I got asserted. Such epithets only cloud the mind and inflame emotion. The history of the world is full of examples of where that combination leads. We need to understand one another better, even if only for the purpose of disagreeing more effectively. And it just might happen that we find some areas of common ground. 

             I’m a card-carrying liberal (though I prefer the word “progressive”), but I know those “other” folk out there in the rest of America very well. My roots are deep in fundamentalist Christianity, and I never stopped being a “born again” Christian even when my theology and social convictions became radically different. I can still speak the lingo, as I was reminded on a recent trip to the South. I spent many days totally immersed in my cousin’s Pentecostal Church of God network:  reading the Bible, praying at the drop of a hat, and organizing a community effort to build a house—totally free of labor cost—for an old woman whose motor home was rusting out under her feet. These are “salt of the earth” folk, deeply worried about the future of America .

             As am I, for very different reasons. Since we’re both worried about the state of the soul of America , wouldn’t it be a good idea if we cut through the carefully crafted, highly-manipulative rhetoric coming from Left, Right, and Center, and tried to understand one another’s concerns better? Dialogue and debate are the lifeblood of democracy. Fear, mudslinging and demonizing, however common in the history of American politics, are the building blocks of demagoguery, the prelude to tyranny—whether that be the tyranny of an individual, or of the majority.

            Those of us who are not religious rightists need to understand three main areas in order to see more clearly what’s going on here.

             1)  Religion has always been a major force in American culture and politics, and conservatives have felt deeply troubled by its progressive exclusion from public life. The way American history is taught these days in school often leaves out the religiously-based origin or influence in the abolition of slavery, the women’s suffrage movement, the labor movement, and even the civil rights activism of the 1960s, so heavily church-based. Religion has been on both the pro and con side of almost every major political issue in our history. Too often, Hollywood and academia portray only religion’s opposition to progressive values, not its support of them.

             Religious values inevitably influence one’s opinions about social issues: many liberal Christians support gay marriage for theological reasons, just as most conservatives oppose it. As conservatives see clearly, humanism or secularism are also moral meaning systems, secular parallels to religion no less rooted in values and worldview. It’s impossible to keep religion out of politics. We’ve got to learn how to have it enter debates without paralyzing it—and keep one religious group from gaining the clout to impose its own sectarian values on the rest of the country. 

             2)  The current clash is only the latest round in a religious/general culture battle that’s been going on since the early days of the republic. The book Touchdown Jesus shows that conservative protest against the “corrupting” power of the entertainment industry, for example, began early in the 1800s. The battle over the teaching of evolution in schools (brilliantly, but unfairly, satirized in the influential play and movie Inherit the Wind) has erupted more than once. The issue of prayer in school was seriously debated in the 19th century. 

             3)  The idea that America is divided into two camps on values is misleading at best. The reality is much more complex culturally, and personally. My liberal neighbor finally confessed that she does share some concerns with the religious right “now that I’m raising teenagers.” Maybe some forms of censoring record lyrics aren’t all wrong, and violence in video games is out of hand, she opined, awkward in her departure from liberal political correctness. A recent brain study shows conclusively that many people who voted for Bush had some positive feelings about Kerry, even if they denied it verbally.

             Conservatives are typically most vocal about the moral values surrounding sex and family; liberals about the moral values relating to large social issues like poverty and the environment. Both have families and live in society. We need to look for common ground, even as we disagree. The theologically conservative, socially liberal Christian leader Jim Wallis suggests that we can begin by “claiming the major values of the Hebrew prophetic heritage” which are the basis of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, as well as an important element in Humanist thought. Respect for the individual, concern for the poor, distrust of money manipulating power, humility before humanity’s place in creation, and a stern call to morality and personal accountability. Maybe the common ground of our shared heritage could create a better vocabulary for our debate.

            And a lot better than thinking the other side landed from Mars.

—Robert Corin Morris  

Our Winter 2005 Guide to Wholistic Living, mailed to members, will include an excerpt on "Making Meaning" from Bob's forthcoming book. Become a member now!


Interweave Comes to Maplewood

People who live in the South Orange-Maplewood area and points East will have a chance to attend select Interweave events nearer home this Winter/Spring semester. We’re launching a new evening lecture series, Tuesdays in Maplewood , in the facilities of St. George’s Church , 550 Ridgewood Rd. at Woodland , near the “ Maplewood Village ” shopping area. A Saturday workshop in March is also planned.

Ever wished you’d have a chance to catch an event you missed, or get a mini-version? Our February 8 lecture “Beyond Red and Blue” will feature highlights from our six-week Summit course, “Religious Zeal and the Culture Wars” with  Director Robert Morris and Drew Professor Michael Christensen. The March 8 evening will be a catchy presentation of “The Biological Roots of Mysticism and Religion” featuring material in our longer “Is there a God Gene?” course in Summit . (Take the longer course and bring a friend to the one-evening event!) On April 12, Lisa Green will be breaking new ground with “A Poetry Primer.”

You don’t have to live in the Maplewood area to enjoy any of these events, and especially not for our Saturday, March 5 workshop, “Seeking the God Beyond God: Transpersonal Images of the Holy,” with Bob Morris.

St. George’s has opened its doors to Interweave, so you can expect other events in future semesters. Come and bring your friends!